OK, Pengerators, I'm back; sorry to be away so long, but I've read tons of posts today on my first day back and thank you for your effort.
On another matter, I am sensitive to your concerns that this platform has problems, but please make your comments in the space I've made for them. Just as it would be inappropriate to write criticism on the boards of a teacher's room, understand that it is extremely inappropriate to vent your complaints on top of your peers' work.
That said, I've just read all the posts for #3 and notice that far too many of you responded not to a peer's summary, as requested, but to the original articles, exactly what I asked you not to do.
Please look at
those by Daniel B, Daniela, Cameron, Alyssa, RArena, and Devon; as well as KatieB, Nico, Audrey, David, Addie, Iris, MaddieS, Dustin, CYang, SarahOatmeal, Maddy, Lucia, and Brianna to see the right idea.
If you instead responded to the original article, and NOT a peer essay
, please repost on this thread by Next Monday, so that you've completed the correct assignment before we begin school. You are:
"A-L": JT, Jeremy, Ari, Eleanor, "Nikkai", VickiHB, Vivian, Sara-q, mia, patneedsham
"M-Z": Juniper, Audrey, Amy, HeyvaRadish (whoRU?) DanielM